翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Collecticus ・ Collateral assurance ・ Collateral Billing number ・ Collateral circulation ・ Collateral consequence ・ Collateral Consequences Calculator ・ Collateral consequences of criminal conviction ・ Collateral contract ・ Collateral damage ・ Collateral damage (disambiguation) ・ Collateral Damage (film) ・ Collateral Damage (Millennium) ・ Collateral Damage (The Wire) ・ Collateral Defect ・ Collateral eminence ・ Collateral estoppel ・ Collateral fact doctrine ・ Collateral fissure ・ Collateral Karma ・ Collateral ligament ・ Collateral ligament of interphalangeal articulations of hand ・ Collateral ligament of knee ・ Collateral ligament of metatarsophalangeal articulations ・ Collateral ligaments of interphalangeal articulations ・ Collateral ligaments of interphalangeal articulations of foot ・ Collateral ligaments of metacarpophalangeal articulations ・ Collateral ligaments of metatarsophalangeal articulations ・ Collateral management ・ Collateral protection insurance ・ Collateral source rule Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Collateral estoppel ： ウィキペディア英語版 Collateral estoppel Collateral estoppel (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion, is a common law estoppel doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that, "once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision ... preclude() relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a party to the first case".〔''San Remo Hotel v. San Francisco'', 545 U.S. 323 (2005), fn. 16.〕 The rationale behind issue preclusion is the prevention of legal harassment and the prevention of abuse of judicial resources. == Issue == Parties may be estopped from litigating determinations on issues made in prior actions. The determination may be an issue of fact or an issue of law. Preclusion requires that the issue decided was actually and necessarily decided as part of a valid final judgment. Valid final judgments of state courts are given preclusive effect in other state and federal courts under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Valid final judgments must be issued by courts with appropriate personal and subject matter jurisdiction. It is notable, however, that an error does not make a decision invalid. Reversible errors must be appealed. The legal defense (CE) applies even if an erroneous judgment, or erroneous use of legal principles, occurred in the first action. An incorrect conclusion of the court in the first suit does not cause defendant to forsake the protection of ''res judicata'' (and by extension, of CE).〔Federated Dept. Stores v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394 (1981)〕 A judgment need not be correct to preclude further litigation; it is sufficient that it be final, and that it have been decided on the merits of the case. Collateral estoppel does not prevent an appeal of a decision, or a party from asking the judge for re-argument or a revised decision. In federal court, judgments on appeal are given preclusive effect. However, if the decision is vacated, the preclusive effect of the judgment fails. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Collateral estoppel」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.